Expert Consulting

Quantify Centralisation Risk for Crypto Litigation

Prove operational control in "decentralised" defendants using peer-reviewed methodology.

The defence says "the protocol is decentralised."

BREM proves they retained database-admin-level control.

What We Deliver

Full BREM assessment of the defendant's protocol, mapping Mutation Authority (sm) to operational control. Quantified, evidence-based, court-ready.

Targeted questions for deposing technical witnesses, structured around the 9 BREM cells. Know exactly where to probe.

Methodology grounded in empirical data (83 projects, 92.5% sensitivity) submitted to IEEE peer review. Designed for Daubert standard.

Available for deposition and trial testimony. Clear, jargon-free explanation of governance centralisation for judges and juries.

Empirically validated

83 real-world projects, F1=0.929. Not theoretical — proven against actual outcomes.

Peer-reviewed methodology

Submitted to IEEE ICBC 2026. The framework and dataset are publicly available for opposing counsel to examine.

Quantitative, not qualitative

BREM produces integer scores (0-4) per cell with explicit branching logic. Reproducible, auditable, defensible.

$15K-$50K per engagement. Confidential initial consultation available.